In addition to being used as load-bearing walls, CMUs may be used as non-load bearing partition walls. They can be used in both interior and exterior settings. They are also used in columns and foundations.Ĭoncrete blocks are used in applications requiring a sudden load and tensile resistance. This is usually accomplished by having slots cut into the sides of blocks that receive steel or concrete bars or mesh.ĬMUs are typically used in interior applications for partition walls, such as the walls between rooms or between a building and an attached garage. When used in a load-bearing capacity, masonry walls use steel or concrete reinforcement within the masonry units. Although fire-resistance is not part of the typical CMU design, CMUs can be used to increase fire-resistance when it is necessary. They may also be designed to imitate wood or stone so that they “mimic” more costly materials.ĬMUs are used in areas where they are less likely to be affected by weathering, fire, and water. CMU wall panels are often used in place of traditional wood frame construction.ĬMUs that have been designed for exterior use can be given a surface to protect them from the weather. They can also be used for load-bearing exterior walls and foundation. Because they are inexpensive, CMUs are most often used in interior applications, such as: Concrete Masonry Units Applications & UsesĬMUs are typically used for load-bearing and non-load bearing purposes. Other common shapes include long blocks for floor slabs, short blocks for wall foundations, and round blocks for chimneys and fireplaces.Ĭoncrete masonry unit designs may also include distinctive patterns or textures to create visual appeal. The most common are rectangular blocks, such as brick, with a square or rectangular cross-section. Man-handled CMUs are seen as more traditional because they are individually made by workers using a variety of tools and machines to create each block.Ĭoncrete masonry units can be manufactured in a variety of different shapes and sizes. Next up, the Camels will return to their SoCon slate, hosting Presbyterian and Davidson on January 28 in the team's 2023 home finale.Automated CMUs are manufactured on a fully automated manufacturing line where the entire process of mixing, forming, and curing can be done without any human interference. CU's upper weights once again swept, 3-0, finishing with Ghadiali's 11-8 decision at heavyweight, but came up just a point short in the team scoring, 19-18.īoth Caleb and Levi Hopkins, along with Ghadiali and Hanna went 3-0 on the day, while Zaccone and Hixenbaugh combined for a CU sweep at 133 pounds for the Camels. A 3-1 extra time win from American's Patrick Ryan at 157 pounds, followed by Caleb Campos' 13-1 major decision and Lucas White's pin (2:04), however, gave the Eagles a 19-9 advantage with three weight classes remaining. 32 Maximilian Leete's pin at 125 gave AU the early 6-0 lead before decisions from No. 31 Alex Cramer at 174 pounds, but CU again locked up the final three weight classes, including decisive third period takedowns from Caleb Hopkins at 184 and Ghadiali at heavyweight, to secure the 23-15 dual win. CMU came back to take a 15-14 lead with four straight victories, including a 16-1 tech fall for No. 25 Anthony Molton notching a first period pin over Sean Spidle at 125 pounds (1:12), and back to back major decisions from Gabriel Hixenbaugh, 16-5, and No. In its next appearance on the mat, Campbell jumped out to a 14-0 lead over the Chippewas with No. 13 Taye Ghadiali finished the bout with a first period pin (1:22), topping Jake Andrews. 29 Levi Hopkins at 197, 17-2 (6:49) over Mateo Morales. 28 Caleb Hopkins at 184 (6:36) over Jacob Hansen, and a tech fall from No. In CU's opener, the Camels closed out the Roadrunners with three straight bonus point victories, extending their 15-8 lead with a pin from No. The Eagles reeled off a trio of one point victories, topping the Chippewas 18-17 and Bakersfield 16-15 before edging the host Camels 19-18 in the finale.Ĭampbell defeated the Roadrunners 32-8 and CMU 23-15, while Bakersfield added a 21-16 win in the day's opener.įull team and match by match results can be found below. Central Michigan (3-8), meanwhile, finished 0-3. – Campbell defeated Central Michigan 23-15 and CSU Bakersfield 32-8, while falling to American 19-18 in the 2023 Chippewa Challenge, hosted by the Camels on Sunday at the Pope Center / Gore Arena.Īmerican (7-7) claimed its first Chippewa Challenge, going 3-0 on the day, while Campbell (10-8) posted a 2-1 performance and CSU Bakersfield (1-5) went 1-2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |